πŸ‘‘ A Compelling Reason To…

β€œI am become a fool in glorying; ye have compelled me: for I ought to have been commended of you: for in nothing am I behind the very chiefest apostles, though I be nothing” (II Cor. 12:11).

The Apostle Paul did not like to β€œglory” orΒ boastΒ about his apostleship. He would much rather spend his time teaching the great truths of the Mystery, and the Word of God, rightly divided. However, the immaturity of the Corinthians β€œcompelled” him to such boasting. They were so impressed with the boasting of the β€œfalse apostles” (II Cor. 11:13) that Paul was forced to speak to them in the only language they seemed to understandβ€”that ofΒ boasting.

Grace believers are often accused of boasting too much about the apostleship of Paul, and to this we plead guilty. We too would much rather spend our time teaching the great truths of the Word of God, rightly divided. However, the sorry state of modern Christianity is such that we too are β€œcompelled” to boast about Paul’s apostleship. The immaturity of contemporary Christianity has caused them to overlook Paul as β€œthe apostle of the Gentiles” (Rom. 11:13), and presents us withΒ a compelling reasonΒ to emphasize his apostleship.

Paul found the Corinthian situation especially disappointing, since as he told them, β€œI ought to have been commended of you.” As the one who had begotten them in the gospel (I Cor. 4:15), they should have been singing the praises of his apostleship, instead of forcing him to defend it. And so it is today. All who are saved in the dispensation of Grace are saved by grace through faith apart from works (Eph. 2:8,9), a gospel that isΒ exclusiveΒ to the Apostle Paul. And so in a very real sense, all who are saved today are begotten of the Apostle Paul, and should be singing the praises of his apostleship, instead of forcing us to defend it.

The false apostles in Corinth were probably protesting, β€œWhy, Paul isn’t even one of the twelve apostles! We have as much authority as he has!” This forced Paul to declare that he was β€œnot a whit behind” the very chiefest apostles, i.e., James, Peter and John. But if Paul only claimed he wasn’t β€œbehind” the twelve apostles, why do we insist on emphasizing his epistlesΒ aheadΒ of the epistles of James, Peter and John?

Ah, Paul’s apostleship wasΒ equalΒ to theirs, but he was the apostleΒ of a different group of people. As he told the Galatians, β€œHe that wrought effectually in PeterΒ to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in meΒ toward the Gentiles” (Gal. 2:8). All state governors are equal in authority; no governor is a whit behind any other. However, if I am wise, I must recognize the authority of the governor ofΒ myΒ state. And if we are wise as Christians, we must likewise recognize the authority of β€œthe apostle of the Gentiles.” source

Sign up for our daily email study!
Posted in πŸ‘‘ Studies
Subscribe
Notify of

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

New Posts to Inbox?

Site Search

Verse of the Day

But if from thence thou shalt seek the LORD thy God, thou shalt find him, if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.

Featured Video

Featured Video

Doctrine Studies

Revived Life Poll

Which fruit of the Spirit is most lacking in you?

View Results

Β Loading ...

Revived Life Β© Β Β 
Privacy Policy | Contact
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Exit mobile version