πŸ‘‘ No Beauty That We Should Desire Him

β€œLes Feldick taught that Isaiah 53:2 doesn’t mean the Lord Jesus was ugly, but that there was nothing in Him that would attract the Jews to Him as their King and Messiah. What do you say?”

I never thought about it that way, but Les is right! Isaiah wrote:

β€œβ€¦when we shall see Him, there is no beauty that we should desire Him.”

In the context, we find a description of the Lord just a few verses earlier that has to be taken into consideration to determine what the prophet meant:

β€œβ€¦His visage was so marred more than any man, and His form more than the sons of men” (Isa. 52:14).

This is a picture of the Lord after the scourging they gave Him just before nailing Him to the cross. This somber image of what He endured to pay for our sins is what believers have in mind when the world observes β€œGood Friday”.

But that means Isaiah was saying there was nothing in Him that the β€œpeople” of Israel (Isa. 53:8) would desire in a king. They rejected Him because they were looking for more of a β€œchampion on a white horse who will save us from our enemies” kind of Messiah. The Lord may or may not have been a handsome man, but Isaiah wasn’t talking about the features that make up physical attraction. source

Sign up for our daily email study!
Posted in πŸ‘‘ Studies
Subscribe
Notify of

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

New Posts to Inbox?

Site Search

Verse of the Day

But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof.

Featured Video

Featured Video

Doctrine Studies

Revived Life Poll

Which fruit of the Spirit is most lacking in you?

View Results

Β Loading ...

Revived Life Β© Β Β 
Privacy Policy | Contact
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Exit mobile version